Skip to main content
Maintenance12 min read

Preventive Maintenance: The Complete Guide

Lachlan McRitchie

Lachlan McRitchie

GM of Operations

Published 28 April 2026Updated 8 September 2026

Preventive maintenance (PM) is planned work intended to reduce the likelihood or consequences of equipment failure. Teams schedule inspections, servicing and replacement tasks using the requirements for each asset, often by calendar time or usage. Inspection findings and condition monitoring can prompt additional work. The starting point is the equipment manufacturer's guidance, applicable requirements and advice from a competent person where needed. A useful programme records the asset, task, trigger, responsible person and completion evidence. It also leaves a clear path for defects that need attention before the next scheduled service. PM doesn't eliminate breakdowns or guarantee a saving. Some failures need a different task or design change, and low-consequence equipment may suit a different maintenance strategy. Review the programme against actual failures, work completed, operating conditions and cost so the schedule stays appropriate for the equipment and the people relying on it.

Key takeaways

  • PM aims to reduce avoidable failures. Measure its effect against your own asset mix, operating hours, maintenance cost and downtime; there's no universal saving.
  • Set calendar or usage triggers from equipment requirements. Use inspection findings and condition monitoring to raise additional work when needed.
  • Prioritise work by consequence and equipment requirements. A planned-to-reactive ratio is a diagnostic measure, not a universal maintenance target.
  • Define on-time completion, MTBF, MTTR and cost consistently. Set targets for each relevant asset group and disclose missing or incomplete records.
  • Review intervals with the right technical authority. A low-use asset can still need safety-critical servicing; an arbitrary percentage change isn't a service instruction.

What is preventive maintenance and how does it work?

Preventive maintenance schedules appropriate work before a failure occurs. Calendar and usage triggers identify when tasks are due, while equipment-specific checklists record the work and any defects requiring follow-up.

Start with the asset and its actual service requirements. Record its make, model, operating conditions, service history and the source of each task or interval. An oil service, filter inspection and safety-device test may have different triggers even on the same machine. Avoid copying one equipment schedule across a fleet without checking those differences.

Calendar triggers use elapsed time. Usage triggers depend on readings such as kilometres, engine hours or cycles. Where several limits apply, follow the equipment requirements for which limit takes precedence. Record missing or implausible readings as exceptions; a schedule based on an old meter reading can look current while the equipment is overdue.

The work record should identify the task, asset, assigned person and due point. The technician records what was completed, findings and any follow-up work. Parts and labour records need to be entered or supplied by a verified integration. Check how your system handles incomplete work, rescheduling and the next service before relying on an automated workflow.

Preventive vs reactive maintenance: costs and trade-offs

Reactive repairs can incur call-out costs, parts delays and lost production. Planned work can reduce some of those costs, but its value depends on the failure mode, consequence and cost of the preventive task.

Reactive work starts after a fault or failure is found. On a critical asset, an unexpected repair can interrupt several other activities, so the repair invoice alone may understate the impact. On low-consequence equipment, planned run-to-failure can sometimes be appropriate. Make that decision deliberately with the people responsible for the equipment, safety and operations.

Keep capacity for corrective work and unexpected faults. A planned-to-reactive ratio can help show how work is changing, but there isn't a single ratio or timetable that proves a programme is healthy. Define whether you are comparing work orders, labour hours or cost, and retain that basis in later reviews. A change in counting rules can otherwise look like improvement.

Compare the cost of the preventive task with the failures it is intended to address. Include relevant labour, consumables, repair cost and operational interruption, while avoiding double counting lost production. Record assumptions where downtime cost is estimated. A failure avoided is difficult to observe directly, so use a comparable period or asset group and disclose changes in usage, equipment and staffing.

Building a preventive maintenance schedule

Start by listing every asset, ranking them by criticality, then assigning service intervals based on manufacturer recommendations and operational data. A realistic PM schedule balances thoroughness with available labour hours, so begin with high-criticality assets and expand coverage as the programme matures.

The biggest mistake organisations make is trying to schedule preventive maintenance for everything at once. That approach overwhelms technicians, creates a backlog and erodes trust in the programme before it delivers results. A better path is to prioritise. Rank each asset by criticality, considering the impact of its failure on safety, production, compliance and cost. Focus the first wave of PM schedules on assets in the top tier.

For each asset, define the task, due trigger, required competence and estimated labour. Check the manufacturer's guidance, warranty conditions and applicable requirements. Dust, load, corrosion or changed duty can affect the appropriate schedule, but don't shorten or extend an interval by a blanket percentage. Record the technical basis and approval for any change.

Review due work against available people, parts and access to the equipment. Where many services fall together, assess which can be planned differently without breaching their requirements. Keep safety-critical and overdue work visible. Software may help organise the workload, but confirm what the configured system actually calculates or assigns rather than assuming it balances capacity automatically.

Keep a traceable schedule and completion record. Review it when equipment, duty, failure patterns or relevant requirements change. In Australia, Safe Work Australia's model code for managing plant risks provides guidance on maintenance and records, including manufacturer recommendations and competent-person advice. The model code's legal effect depends on the jurisdiction; check the relevant regulator and equipment-specific requirements. The source is linked below.

Plan preventive maintenance in MapTrack

Keep asset records, scheduled work and service history together in MapTrack. Check the triggers, readings and assignments your team will use before rollout.

  • No credit card required
  • 30 days free trial
  • Cancel anytime

Preventive maintenance checklists and SOPs

A preventive maintenance checklist is a step-by-step list of inspection and service tasks for a specific asset and service interval. Standard operating procedures (SOPs) wrap around checklists to define safety precautions, required tools, acceptable tolerances and escalation paths when defects are found.

Use a checklist to make the required work and evidence clear. Each task should identify the component, method, acceptance criteria and what to do if it fails. Record measurements where they matter rather than relying on a tick alone. The checklist supports a competent technician; it doesn't replace training, the manufacturer's instructions or judgment about an unsafe condition.

Arrange tasks in a sensible working order and distinguish inspections from servicing actions. Include the asset identity, date, responsible person and outstanding defects. Keep the wording practical and readable at the point of work. A short checklist is useful only if it still covers the required tasks; don't remove necessary checks to meet an arbitrary page limit.

The surrounding procedure should explain isolation, access, required competence and escalation for defects outside the task's scope. Select precautions for the actual equipment and work, including stored energy and environmental conditions. Use the relevant manufacturer and workplace safety requirements. Completion evidence should show the work performed and unresolved exceptions, without implying that a signed checklist alone proves compliance.

Measuring PM programme effectiveness with KPIs

Useful measures include on-time PM completion, planned and unplanned work, mean time between failures, mean time to repair and maintenance cost. Define the population and calculation before setting targets for a relevant asset group.

For on-time PM completion, divide the eligible scheduled tasks completed by their due point by the eligible tasks due in the same period. State how cancelled, deferred, partially completed and late-entered work is treated. Review overdue work by consequence as well as count. A percentage alone doesn't tell you whether a critical inspection was missed or why work couldn't be completed.

Compare planned and unplanned work using a stated basis, such as labour hours or cost. Keep the classification consistent and show missing records. A falling unplanned share can be encouraging, but it may also reflect a lighter operating period, different equipment or changed recording practices. Review the underlying faults and work history before attributing the change to PM.

For repairable equipment, calculate MTBF using operating time and the defined failure events in a consistent population. For MTTR, state whether repair duration means active repair time or elapsed time including delays. No recorded failure doesn't establish infinite reliability, and an open repair isn't a completed repair. Report sparse or incomplete observations so small samples aren't mistaken for a dependable trend.

If using maintenance cost as a share of replacement asset value, define the cost categories, accounting period and valuation basis. Compare similar equipment and usage. A higher ratio can reflect asset age, changed prices or a major service, so it doesn't by itself prove poor maintenance or justify replacement. Set targets from your operating requirements and evidence, rather than an unsupported industry-wide range.

Common preventive maintenance mistakes

The most common PM mistakes are over-maintaining low-criticality assets, under-maintaining high-criticality ones, setting intervals without data, skipping root cause analysis on repeat failures and treating the PM programme as a set-and-forget system that never gets reviewed.

Doing unnecessary work consumes time and parts and can introduce errors, but you can't identify it from an interval alone. A shorter service interval may be required for a particular duty or condition. Check the applicable equipment guidance and technical rationale before changing it. Don't defer safety-critical tasks or extend services simply because previous inspections found no defect.

Under-maintenance is the opposite failure, and it is more dangerous. It typically affects assets that are hard to access, located at remote sites or perceived as less important. A backup generator that only runs during power outages still needs regular fuel system, battery and coolant checks. A safety shower in a chemical plant still needs flow testing. These assets are low-use but high-consequence, and they are the ones most likely to slip through the cracks in a PM schedule.

Review repeated failures, inspection findings and incomplete work together. Repeated faults may call for a different task, competent-person assessment or equipment change, rather than simply more frequent servicing. A task that has found no defect may still be necessary. Record the reason, technical approval and effective date of schedule changes so later results can be compared with the correct version.

How software automates preventive maintenance

Maintenance software can bring asset records, planned work and completion history together. Verify its configured triggers, assignments, notifications and data inputs against the workflows your team will actually use.

Test a representative service from setup through completion. Confirm how a due date or meter threshold produces work, who receives it and what happens if a reading is missing. Check notifications and overdue handling with the intended roles. Automatic assignment, condition-triggered work and recalculation after service depend on the product and configuration; don't assume they are included in every maintenance system.

A useful asset record links the service history, inspection findings and outstanding work to the right equipment. Keep the supporting records complete and accessible to the people who need them. Software doesn't make missing evidence appear or guarantee an audit outcome. Check how staff record exceptions and how records are retrieved when equipment changes site or responsibility.

For mobile equipment, keep its location and responsibility current alongside the service plan. Check whether a transfer changes the assigned team or requires a manual handover. Any integration should be verified for the data it supplies, how recently it was updated and how failures are handled. A connected system is useful only when the resulting work record is accurate.

Preventive maintenance for vehicles, equipment and facilities

Maintenance requirements depend on the specific equipment, use and applicable rules. Vehicles may use time and odometer limits, plant may use operating hours or cycles, and facilities combine calendar tasks with inspection findings and equipment-specific requirements.

For vehicles, use the applicable manufacturer schedule and inspect the systems relevant to the vehicle and its work. Specialised equipment mounted on a vehicle may have separate requirements. Record the due limits and the readings used to determine them. A generic vehicle checklist can help organise the record, but it isn't a substitute for the correct service instructions.

For heavy equipment, identify the model, duty and required service tasks before setting intervals. Operating hours and cycles can be useful inputs, but the tasks due at a given reading vary by machine. Keep critical defects visible between scheduled services. Estimate downtime cost from the affected operation when needed; a universal hourly figure isn't a reliable planning basis.

For facilities, map each system to its actual inspection and maintenance requirements. Fire protection, electrical equipment, HVAC and building access systems have different technical and regulatory needs. Check the relevant requirements with competent people rather than treating an example calendar as a compliance schedule. Keep records for the individual equipment and follow up defects with a named responsible person.

Related definitions

Preventive Maintenance

Preventive maintenance (PM) is a proactive maintenance strategy in which assets are serviced at predetermined time or usage intervals to reduce the likelihood of failure. Tasks may include inspections, lubrication, filter changes, calibrations, and component replacements. PM schedules are typically based on manufacturer recommendations, regulatory requirements, or historical failure data.

See definition →

Corrective Maintenance

Corrective maintenance refers to repair or restoration work carried out after a fault, defect, or failure has been identified in an asset. It may be triggered by an operator report, a failed inspection, or an unexpected breakdown. Corrective tasks range from minor adjustments to major overhauls, depending on the severity of the issue.

See definition →

Predictive Maintenance

Predictive maintenance (PdM) uses real-time data from sensors, IoT devices, and analytics to forecast when an asset is likely to fail, enabling maintenance to be performed just before a breakdown occurs. Techniques include vibration analysis, oil analysis, thermal imaging, and machine-learning models trained on historical failure data. It represents the most advanced tier of proactive maintenance strategies.

See definition →

Condition-Based Maintenance

Condition-based maintenance (CBM) is a strategy that triggers maintenance actions based on the actual measured condition of an asset rather than fixed time intervals. Condition indicators may include vibration levels, temperature, pressure, fluid analysis results, or visual inspections. It sits between simple preventive maintenance and fully predictive maintenance on the maturity spectrum.

See definition →

Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF)

Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) is a reliability metric that measures the average elapsed time between inherent failures of a repairable system during normal operation. It is calculated by dividing the total operational time by the number of failures over a given period. MTBF is typically expressed in hours and is used to compare the reliability of assets, components, or equipment models.

See definition →

Mean Time to Repair (MTTR)

Mean Time to Repair (MTTR) measures the average time required to diagnose and fix a failed asset and return it to operational status. It includes diagnosis, sourcing parts, performing the repair, testing, and return to service, and is calculated by dividing the total repair time across all failures by the number of failure events in a given period. MTTR is a key input to availability calculations and is often tracked alongside Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) to give a complete picture of asset reliability and maintainability. Some organisations distinguish between Mean Time to Repair (active repair time only) and Mean Time to Restore, also called Mean Time to Recover (the full elapsed time including waiting for parts, travel and administrative delays), as the broader measure often reveals improvement opportunities beyond wrench-time efficiency.

See definition →

Downtime

Downtime is any period during which an asset is unavailable for its intended function. It can be planned (scheduled maintenance, shutdowns, inspections) or unplanned (breakdowns, failures, waiting for parts). Downtime is typically measured in hours and expressed as a percentage of total available time, providing a key indicator of asset availability.

See definition →

Maintenance Scheduling

Maintenance scheduling is the process of planning when maintenance tasks will be performed, assigning resources (technicians, parts, equipment), and sequencing work to minimise disruption to operations. Effective scheduling balances preventive maintenance intervals, corrective work priorities, resource availability, and production demands. It transforms a backlog of work orders into an executable plan.

See definition →

Work Order

A work order is a formal document or digital record that authorises and tracks a specific maintenance task. It typically includes the asset identification, description of work required, priority, assigned technician, parts needed, safety requirements, and completion details. Work orders provide a structured workflow from request through approval, execution, and closeout.

See definition →

Computerised Maintenance Management System (CMMS)

A CMMS is software that centralises maintenance information, automates work order management, and tracks the upkeep of physical assets such as plant, equipment, and fleet. It stores service history, schedules preventive tasks, and manages spare parts inventory. Organisations use a CMMS to move from reactive, paper-based maintenance to a structured, data-driven approach.

See definition →

FAQ

What is the difference between preventive and predictive maintenance?
Preventive maintenance plans appropriate tasks using equipment requirements, commonly by time or usage. Predictive approaches use condition information to help anticipate a failure or need for work. Teams can combine these approaches, but should check whether the available data supports the decision and whether any fixed servicing requirement still applies.
How often should preventive maintenance be performed?
Use the requirements for the specific equipment, its duty and applicable rules. Start with manufacturer guidance and obtain competent-person advice where needed. Review intervals when conditions or evidence change, with a recorded technical basis. A generic daily, monthly or annual checklist isn't a service instruction for every asset.
What percentage of maintenance should be preventive?
There isn't a universal percentage that makes a programme effective. Choose maintenance strategies for the failure modes and consequences involved, while meeting the equipment's requirements. Track planned and unplanned work on a consistent basis and use the pattern to investigate problems, rather than treating a fixed ratio as proof of success.
Does preventive maintenance actually save money?
It can, when the tasks address relevant failure modes at an appropriate cost and interval. Planned work also has costs and can be unnecessary if poorly chosen. Compare total maintenance and operational impact for similar equipment and usage, disclose assumptions and avoid promising a fixed saving without supporting evidence.
What is a preventive maintenance checklist?
It's a structured record of inspection and service tasks for specified equipment and work. It should identify the asset, task, acceptance criteria, responsible person, completion and defects needing follow-up. Adapt it to the relevant service instructions and requirements; a generic form alone doesn't establish that the equipment is safe or compliant.

Ready to track every asset?

Join construction, mining and field service teams across Australia.

G2 4.9 out of 5 stars4.9 on G2 · 5.0 on CapterraCapterra 5.0 out of 5 stars
  • No credit card required
  • 30 days free trial
  • Cancel anytime